Tag Archives: derek webb

Grace and Tradition, part 2

Picking up from yesterday…Galatians 2:

Verses 1-5: 14 years had passed since Paul began his ministry to the Gentiles in Syria and Cilicia (Galatians 1:21-24), so Paul and Barnabas returned to Jerusalem to report in.  While there, a few things happened: they preached the same message of grace and peace, and, some “pretending to be Christians” (see 1:6-9) snuck in.  Wow.  I am blown away by that last “happening”.  In chapter 1, Paul says that anyone preaching a gospel of law was lying about God, and now, he is saying that these same people are not even Christians!  We know that Paul is linking these two because he writes, “Their ulterior motive was to reduce us to their brand of servitude.”  Make no mistake, people that desire a return to the law…ANY law, want to put you (and I) in bondage.

Verses 6-10: Paul is not caught up in pomp and circumstance.  The people that are “considered important” within the body?  He remains unimpressed, and stated that they were so neutered by their adherence to the Law that they had nothing to add to the Gospel of grace and peace.  They then left for ministry, their task confirmed by the church leaders (the “pillars of the church”, as opposed to those “considered important).

Verses 11-13: Paul shares a confrontation that he had between the Gospel of Grace and Peace and the gospel of law.  In Antioch, all was well initially between Peter and Paul, until “the conservative group” (those pretending to be Christians? Proclaimers of lies about God?) showed up.  When they did, Peter acted like the Gentiles did not exist, and had nothing to do with them.  What’s more, even the other Jews joined Peter, including Barnabas in “this charade”!

Verses 14-16: Paul, apparently not in a “Matthew 18″ kind of mood, (the one who does not “speak strongly to manipulate crowds, or curry favor with God, or get popular applause”-see chapter 1:10) went to Peter in front of the whole crowd and called him on it.  In essence, Paul tells Peter that the old rules just don’t apply anymore, and that it is the height of hypocrisy to act like they do…especially just to impress Peters’ “old Jerusalem cronies.”  Paul reminds Peter that the Jews had the best system of rules ever devised, and that they were, and are, utterly worthless.

Verses 17-18: Paul continues this public assault by telling Peter (and now everyone) that no one is perfect.  If perfection is not automatic through Christ…is Jesus causing them to sin?  No!  If Paul was simply “trying to be good”, the entire concept of the Gospel of Grace and Peace is a joke , a failure.  So, should we revert to the law?  The law that we know brings death?

Verses 19-21: Paul busted his hump trying to keep the law, even resorting to the punishment of those that did not “keep up.”  Because that’s what happens when the law reigns supreme, especially a law impossible to keep.  So, Paul quit trying.  He died.  That’s was the Damascus experience really was.  The death of Saul and the birth of Paul.  He died and became a new creature, the scales were removed and, like Jesus, he became fully alive.  And, it’s not about Paul!  He is no longer interested in appearing righteous or looking good.  Why?  He is dead.  Christ lives in him.  Ultimately, the return to rules = death, an unnecessary death of Christ Himself.

For discussion:

  • Is the true Gospel, the One of Grace and Peace being preached, discussed and proclaimed in your church?  In your youth ministry?  In your conversations with people?
  • If God is not impressed with appearance, why do we try so hard to “adjust our suit of figs” (thanks to Derek Webb!!)?
  • Do we confront people that proclaim a false gospel?
  • Once we participate in Grace and Peace, why do we seek to return to the law?
  • How have you died in Christ?

 

 

 

So many thoughts.

Like many Americans, I watched as the news of the Osama Bin Laden’s death spread in anticipation of President Obama’s official announcement.  And, like many Americans, I have a wide variety of emotions and thoughts.  Here is one that seems to be rising to the top.

In Matthew 26, we find Jesus near the end of his life and in the garden (how fitting).  The guards come to arrest him, and Peter pulls his sword and cuts off the ear of a servant, a man called “Malchus”.  Afterward, Jesus tells him to put the sword away because “all who draw the sword will die by the sword.”

Osama Bin Laden was a man that lived a life of “drawing the sword.” Romans 13 is clear.

“Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.  Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.  For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended.  For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.  Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.”

Translation: God has established all authorities for the role of wielding the sword, that is, to bring justice.  In the perfect scenario (which does not exist, btw), government is out to protect those that cannot themselves.  That is why the Old Testament (in particular) is all about caring for the fatherless, the widow, the poor, the hungry, the naked, etc.  In the perfect world, when we (people) do “right,” government is our friend.  But, when we do wrong (kill the innocent by flying planes into buildings, blow up embassies, etc) we are to “be afraid.”  Why? “For he (governing authorities) does not bear the sword for nothing.  He (governing authorities) is God’s servant, an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer (the aforementioned airplanes into buildings situation).”

Where does the individual Christian fit into all of this?  Therein lies the real question.  Because of our form of government, when it is an agent of wrath, by extension, we are agents of wrath.  And God says all kinds of things about He alone being the avenger.  A few questions:

  • Does He avenge through us?  Could He?
  • If “all who draw the sword, die by the sword”…that includes us, right?
  • How does a nation “turn the other cheek?”
  • How do we ensure that the sword is wielded properly?

Truthfully, my answers to those questions make me a bit uncomfortable and put me at odds with a lot of people and much of what I saw being celebrated last night and today. I’ll close with the lyrics to Derek Webb’s “My Enemies Are Men Like Me”

“I have come to give you life 
and to show you how to live it.
I have come to make things right 
to heal their ears and show you how to forgive them.
Because I would rather die I would rather die, 
I would rather die
, than to take your life.

How can I kill the ones I’m supposed to love
? My enemies are men like me.
I will protest the sword if it’s not wielded well
, my enemies are men like me.

Peace by way of war is like purity by way of fornication, 
it’s like telling someone murder is wrong and then showing them by way of execution.
Because I would rather die I would rather die, 
I would rather die
, than to take your life.

How can I kill the ones I’m supposed to love
? My enemies are men like me.
I will protest the sword if it’s not wielded well
, my enemies are men like me.

When justice is bought and sold just like weapons of war
, the ones who always pay are the poorest of the poor.

How can I kill the ones I’m supposed to love
? My enemies are men like me.
I will protest the sword if it’s not wielded well
, my enemies are men like me”